Kathleen Parker’s Article, First Three Years Aren’t That Critical Essay

Kathleen Parkers Article, First Three Years Arent That CriticalDid your m opposite read to you when you were six weeks old? Did she teach you how to do math problems when you were deuce? Recently, I read an issue of P atomic number 18nting Magazine and found an hold on youngster exploitation. Kathleen Parkers article, First Three Years Arent That Critical tells us that parents today are putting to much emphasis on what the media and medical journals are saying, instead of using prevalent sense. The article emphasizes that parents are going overboard on these new studies using good argumentative techniques. Although I found not all of what she said was accurate, I still felt she got her point across. Parker uses differentiate from scientists and medical books, to further persuade the proofreader to side with her opinion. Parker uses good persuasive techniques by showing that not everything you read in the media about child development is true or factual. Parker also shows that s he is not one-sided on the issue and gives a personal comment about the opposing viewpoint. I feel the precedent proved her point that parents are being ridiculous in how they are raising their child these days. In the first few paragraphs, author attracts the attention of the reader and explains the main point of the article. The author begins the article saying that she Pitys todays parents who want to do the right thing. The sentence attracts the audience to continue reading the article because the sentence sparks curiosity in why the author pities todays parents. The article continues, They parents buy child-rearing books, explore over psychology articles, play Mozart in nurseries festooned with rudiment cards and the periodic table. Parker shows good persuasive technique by describing an exaggerated scenario of what parents are doing these days to try to develop their childs mind. Although the scenario is not believable, the extravaganza helps to prove that parents are being excessive in the way they develop their children. Parker states her position clearly when she comments that parenting should not be that challenging nor as ridiculous as parents are making it. She states that by buying books and playing Mozart to children would be going overboard. This argument could offend people who believe that reading and teaching kids early is a better way to develop their minds or peo... ...ly years is ridiculous. Parker effectively gave evidence to her argument by quoting from scientists and medical literature. Using evidence to support Parkers boilers suit point made the article more persuasive and convincing. Although she gave some information without evidence, such as in the Jefferson story, she still makes a point in the argument. I felt that Kathleen Parker was persuasive in showing that parents are believing too much what the media and what new medical findings are saying and not using common sense during the first few years of a childs life. As a pa rent you should be concentrating on loving and nourishing your child rather than trying to teach it algebra. Parents have been raising their children for thousands of years and I do not believe that these news articles should change the way people are raising their children now. How did your mother raise you? I am sure she did not have a periodic table on hand when she was rocking you to sleep. Parents have other things to worry about rather than trying to change their parental habits because what some controversial news article said. Let parents use what their mother and father utilize when raising them common sense.